2/20/2023 0 Comments Politicats faq![]() ![]() ![]() Huon 09:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC) Reply VandalismĬan we have this article locked from vandals? There's been way too much vandalism on this page.- Ngard039 20:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC) Reply I would love to add the Sacramento Bee article, too, but unfortunately it can only be read by registered users. Is that better?- Ngard039 20:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC) Reply Yes, that's quite a lot better. I actually had links to the articles in exterior links, but someone deleted them.- Ngard039 01:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC) Reply I wouldn't even know where to look for such an article. If there is a newspaper article mentioning those facts, sure, go ahead and put it under "References". I have verifiable sources, but do I really have to put a newpaper quote verifying that Anthony and Ian are really 18 and attend Amercain River College? If it is not, then it does not belong on Wikipedia. For example, "Equipment" - is it really notable that Anthony uses a Dell? Does it have any impact on the quality of Smosh's work? - Huon 15:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Reply Īctually it is, one of the questions frequently asked on the website is "what equipment do you guys use for the videos?" The inclusion of that into the article helps to answer this and cut down on people's questions.- Ngard039 21:23, 1 August 2006 (UTC) Reply I don't object - if it is verifiable. Actually, I believe everything that can't be sourced is not notable enough to be included in the first place. Even if Anthony edited the article in person (and I believe people are discouraged from significantly adding to articles about themselves), he would still need to give reliable sources in order to satisfy WP:RS and WP:NOR. We can't say something "was confirmed by Anthony". Lets just cite what we can from the New York Times article, the magazine article, that interview with Anthony on the Smosh myspace blog, and the rest we can say was confirmed by the webmaster of Smosh or Anthony - Ngard039 14:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Reply Sorry, but no. When I saw this article I just sorta started writing pretty much everything I knew about smosh.- Ashuku 07:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Reply I've been an active part of the smosh community for over 3 years. If none are forthcoming, I might remove all unsourced statements in a few weeks. While I do not doubt the truth of these statements, we should still give reliable sources for them. ![]() "Video history" could also be a little more precise when, for example, "critical acclaim" or "good reviews" are mentioned. Among the worst (in this respect) sections, I would name "Website history", "Removed/Altered videos", "Equipment", and "Trivia". The article contains quite a lot of utterly unsourced statements. 89 Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2018.87 Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2017.86 Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2017.82 Change treatment of Smosh as a "duo".81 Semi-protected edit request on 1 July 2016.79 Request to edit page for addition of information regarding EVERY EVER and PART TIMERS.77 Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2015. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |